Now scientists - the historians studying the early Middle Ages, are unanimous that Alain and various options of this name occur from Central Asian Alani.
(Bernard S. Bahrah - "HISTORY ALAN IN THE WEST")




Сейчас ученые- историки, изучающие раннее средневековье, единодушны в том, что Алейн и различные варианты этого имени происходят от центральноазиатского Алaни.
(Бернард С. БАХРАХ - "ИСТОРИЯ АЛАН НА ЗАПАДЕ")





THE BEST OF ALL TO MAKE THE HOMELAND FOR ALANS IN CALIFORNIA - TO SETTLE ALL PEOPLE WITH the SURNAME ALAN TOGETHER ALL 10 000 000 PEOPLE and Ossetians will have in USA a powerful group of support more powerful than at Jews!







FREE OSETIA

FREE OSETIA
Текущее время: 17-02, 04:51

Часовой пояс: UTC + 3 часа




Начать новую тему Ответить на тему  [ Сообщений: 2 ] 
Автор Сообщение
 Заголовок сообщения: Обращение Чочиева
СообщениеДобавлено: 21-01, 09:14 
Не в сети
Stir Hister

Зарегистрирован: 08-06, 10:46
Сообщения: 1815
http://uasdan.com/chochiev/otvets/140-k ... nnomu.html

УСТАНОВКА

На первом шаге самое ГЛАВНОЕ - юридическими аргументами Права и Закона СССР и ООН показать ПОЛНОЕ ОТСУТСТВИЕ СЕПАРАТИЗМА в случае МЕЖДУ ЮЖНОЙ ОСЕТИЕЙ и ГССР, при НАЛИЧИИ ПРИЗНАКОВ СЕПАРАТИЗМА со стороны ГССР с СССР! Это период правовых и неправовых шагов ГССР, а также и Юго-Осетинской автономной области с сентября 1989 года - до января 1992 года! Никаких других задач - Только Это: ПОЛНОЕ ОТСУТСТВИЕ СЕПАРАТИЗМА ЮОсетии.

ВТОРАЯ УСТАНОВКА - всё только на основе Закона! Никаких отвлечений на то, что там то-то подписал такой-то президент, или эдакий... К примеру, все признают - возражений я ещё не встречал - нелегитимность Беловежских соглашений, но это НЕ ЗАКОН... Это главы-президенты ПО ПОНЯТИЯМ своих частей полит-элит что-то там НЕЗАКОННОЕ подписали... НО НАМ ТУТ - ТОЛЬКО ЗАКОН!


И ПРОСЬБА

Переводчик просил дать прочесть перевод знающему американский английский. Если это тот случай, то буду очень благодарен за уточнённый перевод!
===============

I am very much pleased of the Europarliament commission report (by Tagliavini) exploring the causes of the war in August 2008 – the commission stated as guilty parties those who had triggered the bloodshed, namely - Georgia, Russia and - very unintelligibly – South Ossetia!!! Very little and obscurely is said of the guilt of the latter, but no one can say this more concretely as I am saying this already during 17 years and that’s why I am hiding from killers from all three sides… You will understand everything from the text which I ask you to translate – hardly ever could I make it in into three pages. Sorry.....
-----
TO THE EUPOPARLIAMENT COMMISSION REPORT - CONCRETE CORRECTIONS TO THE PRE-HISTORY OF RUSSIAN-OSSETIAN-GEORGIAN WAR

In the origin of Ossetian-Georgian crisis there is a sign of the end of WWI era – this was noticed by Europarliament commission. It is important to underline it here. But I would like to start from unthinkable premise already in the WWII: I am certain that neither Tagliavini commission team, nor, in general, normal Europeans cannot figure out that in Germany the authorities could ever immortalize Hitler's legacy and built some kind of a shrine somewhere in Berlin.. Still, should this had happened, it would be easy to imagine the reaction of the whole world towards Germany. Yet the commission didn't notice such an act in Georgia - and this was already an act of ideological preparation to the war.
On this more will be said later on in details but by now we should remark that commission didn’t state those legal conditions, which engendered hostilities and split Georgians and Ossetians even before signing the agreement of May 7, 1920 between Soviet Russia and a country never existing before by an unheard of name of “Georgia”. Already one month later the Georgian troops committed in South Ossetia a the pogroms known in the Ossetian history as genocide of 20-ies (by different data some 5 to 18 thousands Ossetians were slain, many refugees remained in the Northern Ossetia for goods).
Also, in the general part of Agreement of 07.05.1920 is directly mentioned the right of other peoples to self-determination and in the Agreement weren’t specified the borders of the parties, - it was planned to discuss them later.
But later the Red Army entered Transcaucasus. And since 1922 South–Ossetian autonomous region exists as a part of Georgian Soviet and Socialist republic. Those events nearly forgotten exploded in full in 1988 after two articles published in the central Georgian press. The”Literaturnaya Gruzia" newspaper of 30 September 1988 stated - "it is necessary to limit birth rate of no-Georgian peoples”, and in November 21 another article – there was offered to deport aliens having more than two children"... In South and North Ossetias started to talk about the raise of Georgian fascism and in 14.01.1989 a civil movement Adamon Nyhas was born, where I was elected chairman. Henceforth the crisis evolved by two lines: 1 – Georgian fascism, 2 – Right and Law of the USSR and UN.
Both lines of the evolution of crisis should be studied separately: ideology and politics separately – the same way – Right and Law. European parliament commission did not this and its report doesn’t contain two the most significant irritant factors of the war; it lacks what the UN Millennium Summit 2000 called the most important in 21 century – and the Summit mentioned the lesson of 1945; and the process is not studied in the framework of Right and Law .


1945 LESSON IN GEORGIAN-OSSETIAN CRISIS

In 1989 in Russia (especially the democrats - А. D. Sakharov and others.) the situation in Georgian Soviet Socialistic Republic was qualified as dangerous – threat of ascension of Gamsakhurdia to power was linked to the possibility of appearance of Nazi regime... At the end of 1990 Gamsakhurdia came to power and in his election rhetoric the following motto were common - «Georgia for Georgians», «we will brush by iron broom the Ossetians out of Caucasian crest», «Ossetians are but savages” etc.
In January 1991– USSR still in place – crisis evolved up to military activities: in Tskhinval street fights were on. Moscow didn’t interfered – after the tragedy of April 9 1989 in Tbilisi Moscow kept aside of Georgian informal organizations and was letting them discredit in the eyes of West. In 1991 already not only in Ossetia or Russia but in western press Gamsakhurdia’s regime was qualified as neofascist one.
In December 1991, the USSR collapsed and Shevardnadze, Ioseliani and Kitovani overthrew the fascist regime of Gamsakhurdia. Shevardnadze days and night spoke at rallies and in the press - he promised to “wash away the black stain of fascism off the Georgian people” and publicly - at the rallies - apologized before the Ossetians for the crimes of the Georgian Nazis.
Since 1994, in the South and North Ossetia in the high-school history textbook was introduced, in which the 32 paragraph narrates the struggle of South Ossetia with the Georgian fascism ... In 1995 Shevardnadze was elected president and again promised to “put an end to Georgian Gamsakhurdia’s fascism”. In 1996 in the Moscow newspaper “Nezavisimaya Gazeta”, Shevardnadze asserted that he “will strengthen and continue to fight the Georgian provincial fascism” and “zviadizm will be finished!” In Ossetia were confident that is about to begin defascisation of Georgia and in a few years the crisis will be overcome - Lesson of 1945 does not suggest anything else!
... The UN Millennium Summit held in 2000 called the 1945 lesson imperishable for mankind. Yet in 2002 Shevardnadze by presidential decree immortalized fascist Gamsakhurdia! By this act he brought the Georgian-Ossetian settlement in a bloody stalemate - it was a decisive step in the ideological preparation for war! Saakashvili then reburied the remains of Gamsakhurdia from the city of Grozny in the pantheon of great figures of Georgia ... And concluded ideological preparation for war. Defascization of Georgia exemplified the lessons from 1945. It actually was a Nazi challenge not only to the Ossetians, but also the UN! But the UN was silent ...
EUROPEAT PARLIAMENT COMMITTEE ON LEGAL PRAPARATION OF THE WAR IN AUGUST 2008 – YET IT LACKS PROPER LEGAL ANALYSIS
The legal preparations for war was started by Georgian government and the communist-nazi-Zviadists together in the Soviet Union - in September 1989. The key event took place in September 1989, when the government of Georgian Socialist Soviet Republic claimed on the return - in relations with Moscow – of the Treaty between Russia and Georgia on May 7, 1920. And decided to package cancellations in the Georgian Socialist Soviet Republic territories - they have declared invalid the Constitution of the USSR as well, and the laws of the Soviet era. The autonomy of South Ossetia was established by law since the Soviet Union - in June 1922, and this means that the overall removal of Soviet laws meant in the Georgian Socialist Soviet Republic the abolition of the autonomy of South Ossetia as well. Silence of South Ossetia discredited the latter in the eyes of the world community and all those who is focused on the right and the law - the silence would mean that South Ossetians are allies of the Georgian separatists. For Moscow, this would mean that apart from the Georgian separatism there are South Ossetian one as well.
These overall cancellations in Georgian Socialist Soviet Republic Soviet of the laws and the Constitution of the Soviet Union meant a gross violation of the legal system of the USSR and the territorial integrity of the Soviet Union! And violated is the international law - an agreement on the inviolability of postwar borders in the world (Helsinki, 1975). In other words, the communist government of the Georgian Socialist Soviet Republic allied with Nazi-Zviadists went to a direct violation of the international order after World War II - this, after 1945, is the most outspoked and rabid separatism throughout the jurisprudence of the international community headed by the UN!
In the first step of the Georgian packet cancellation in September South Ossetia reacted November 10: it has raised its status from the region to the republic, but within the Georgian Soviet Socialist Republic! At this the Central Committee of the Communist party of Georgia and Zviadists replied Nov. 23, 1989 - 30-thousand strong column of Georgians, led by Secretary Gumbaridze and Gamsakhurdia came to Tskhinvali, and we hardly moved threat to the massacre into creeping war
In June-1990 a packet removal in Georgian Soviet Socialist Republic was completed - in the Georgian Soviet Socialist Republic’s legal field the was no autonomy of South Ossetia because the election of deputies and region’s Soviet of autonomy had not been appointed - a legal framework for elections did not exist ... Thus, between the lines about the autonomy of South Ossetia in the Soviet Constitution and by the Center of the USSR hitself disappeared legal link ”GSSR”; - whereas a country by the name of “ Georgia” there was not known at all! Result – South Ossetia was suspended in the non-legal space.
In the Soviet Union was intensively discussed the task of getting away from the vertical subordination “big brothers” – “little brothers” as a task to remove from the structure of the Soviet hierarchy among peoples. Since the beginning of 1990 has been actively discussed “Sakharov project on the arranging of the USSR, from which Yeltsin took its motto – “Take as much sovereignty as you can swallow” ... 20.09.1990 South Ossetia adopted a Declaration of Sovereignty of the South Ossetian Soviet Democratic Republic, and it expressly states that this Soviet Republic is in the Union of Soviet Socialist Republics!
In January 1991 the fascist separatist regime Gamsakhurdia (the authorities were already Zviadists) began the war with South Ossetian Socialist Democratic Republic using as pretext the Declaration of Sovereignty of South Ossetian Socialist Democratic Republic within the USSR of September 20, 1990 ... This is as if a cessation of South Ossetia from Georgia – the separatism ... At the same time they abolished the autonomy of South Ossetia and withdraw the demand and batch, and targeted (this decision was also made), the abolition of the Law on the autonomy of South Ossetia - in Tbilisi, \u0026quot;no notice\u0026quot; ... On the side of South Ossetia, there were no illegal decision - all of them since 1989 were a legitimate response to the unlawful decision of the separatist GSPC and then fascist Georgia ... At the end of all fascist and separatist regime Gamsakhurdia refused to participate in the referendum on the preservation and reform of the USSR 17 March 1991 - and South Ossetia it lawfully engaged and its follow-up remained in the USSR! Two weeks later, this fascist separatist regime GSPC has a legitimate anti-separatist referendum on \u0026quot;independence, Georgia - March 31, but South Ossetia did not participate in it as a legitimate member of the Soviet Union in a referendum held on March 17. And in the “independent Georgia”; there cannot take place!
Separatist fascist regime Gamsakhurdia, the referendum March 31, 1991, announced in May 26, 1991 the newly independent Georgia ... European Commission did not notice an obvious forgery - it turns out that after March 1991, South Ossetia is simultaneously present in two of Independent States’s field - and the USSR, and is no longer composed of ”GSSR” - but within independent from 26 May 1991 the newly formed Georgia
Thus, the report of the European Parliament (Commission Tagliavini) bypassed the main, crucial question of preparing for war in August 2008: the legal question! The Right and the Law - is the sphere of formal relations and the formulas are quite clear: Georgia was not entitled to wage war with South Ossetia as a separatist, since March 1991, South Ossetia remained in the USSR, and newly formed Georgia from the Soviet Union had already left without South Ossetia! No citing legal justification of the situation that South Ossetia - since March 1991 - also was part of two independent states (UN members - the USSR, and not a UN member state - Georgia), the report of the European Parliament PASSED OVER the major cause of the Ossetian-Georgian war - the legal reasons!
After this comes a number of derivatives of issues of legal preparation of the war, without answers to the Commission’s conclusion about the guilt of the Ossetian side is very weak or even hangs in the air ... Whereas in fact South Ossetian regime is primarily responsible for participation in the legal preparations for war! And Russia and Georgia are only involved in this illegal game on the blood not only of the South Ossetians, but also to theirs citizens.


Commission examined the preparation of war between Russia and Georgia, beginning the countdown to 1920. Unfortunately, not deeply investigated in 1992. For it was in 1992, with apparently good process initiated br Shevardnadze, the experts did not see a deeply flawed transition from the legitimately elected Gamsakhurdia’s overthrow o - to the exclusion of law from the process of the Georgian-Ossetian settlement! Then Moscow and the whole world made a choice between the apparent neo-fascists Gamsakhurdia and his “democratically-anti-fascist” opponent Shevardnadze ... But we, the supporters of legal policy of South Ossetia, did not take change the “bad” personalities to the “good” one - we are demanding strict adherence to right and the law and by Shevardnadze as well! Since 1992, the pro-moskovite and pro-tbilissi supporters in South Ossetia, have us pressure up to threats of physical destruction ... To deal with threats to the life of our small parliamentary faction of legal policy in the parliament of South Ossetia, I - as the leader of this trend, was forced to resign!
Since 2001, it became clear that the process goes to war precisely because the right and the law were ignored both in Moscow and Tbilisi ... Since then, we wrote to the media available to us about the inevitability of war, and in 2007 and 2008, I declared it at two international conferences in Armenia (the theme “Southern Caucasus and security of Europe” ), conducted by the European Parliament (MP from Finland and Teri Hakala and Friedrich Ebert Foundation of Germany). At these conferences, I handed over to experts in Moscow, Georgia and the European Parliament a draft resolution on the basis of law, warning that without a legal project - the war in South Ossetia is inevitable in the near future.

After this comes a number of derivatives of issues of legal preparation of the war, without answers to which the Commission’s conclusion that the guilt of the Ossetian side is very weak or even hangs in the air ... Whereas in fact South Ossetian regime is primarily responsible for participation in the legal preparations for war! It is the Government of South Ossetia, which since 1993, has withdrawn from the course of legal policy, ignored the norms and rules of international law. This is even though the only right and the UN Law present the PERFECTION ARGUMENTS for exclusion from the negotiating treatment the MAIN confrontational basis – separatism, that is.
Only settling administrative and territorial disputes in the legal framework of the UN with the involvement of the international community, may help to remove the threat of new exacerbations between Georgia and South Ossetia, which, consequently, means - between West and Russia. .




European Commission examined the preparation of war between Russia and Georgia since 1920 ... But apparently a good process in 1992, started by Shevardnadze did not notice the deeply flawed and its transition from a Gamsakhurdia overthrowing of the legitimately elected - to the exclusion of law from the settlement process itself! Then Moscow and the whole world was to choose between the neo-fascists Gamsakhurdia and his democratically-anti-fascist Shevardnadze ... But we - the supporters of legal policy of South Ossetia, did not noticed change of personalities; - we are demanding strict adherence to right and the law and by Shevardnadze as well!. Since 1992, Moscow and Tbilisi - with their pro-Moscow and pro-Tbilisi supporters in Ossetia, put pressure on us up to the threats of physical elimination ... To deal with threats to the life of a small parliamentary faction in the parliament of South Ossetia, I - as the leader of this trend, was forced to resign! But after 2001, it became clear that the process goes to war precisely because the right and the law is ignored and Moscow, and Tbilisi ... Since then, we wrote to the media available to us about the inevitability of war, and in 2007 and 2008, I declared it at two international conferences in Armenia (the theme “South Caucasus and the security of Europe”), conducted by the European Parliament (MP from Finland and Teri Hakala Friedrich Ebert Foundation of Germany). At these conferences, I handed over to experts in Moscow, Georgia and the European Parliament a draft resolution on the basis of law, warning that without it - without a legal project - the war in South Ossetia is inevitable in the near future ... And the recent steps the legal preparations for war with February 2009 - in a separate text.
Alan Chochiev
1st Vice-President of the Supreme Council of South Ossetia


============

USE OF THE LEGAL POSITIONS FOR PROVOKONG THE WAR – TO THE REPORT OF EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT ON THE PREPARATION OF RUSSIAN-OSSETIAN-GEORGIAN WAW IN AUGUST 2008

The report Europarlament (report of the Tagliavini commission) on the causes of war is the valuation of certain actions by the parties from the standpoint of law. However, there are no obvious indicators of provocation undertaken by Russia and South Ossetia, Saakashvili has to impose a decision on the final crisis of war with South Ossetia. European Parliament and the political community do not have a complete picture of the reasons without the truth of the legal steps to provoke war

MAECH-MAY 1991 AND DECEMBER 1991 - THE BEGINNING OF BASIC LEGAL CONTROVERCY BETWEEN MOSCOW, TBILISI AND TSKHINVALI


After a period from September 1989 to June 1990, when Georgian authorities conducted a series of batch of cancellations, with the abolition of the Soviet Constitution and laws of the Soviet period the Georgian territory, the question was only - what is “Georgian territory ?»... The issue of vital importance to South Ossetia, for territory and autonomy of South Ossetia, and the GSSR area ;have been identified only in Soviet times and fixed laws of the USSR!; The decision of the Georgian authorities to restore relations with Moscow to a treaty between Russia and Georgia on May 7, 1920 nothing does not clarify the issue of Georgian territory\u0026quot;. Since that contract was not resolved this issue - the limits were not established, while recognizing the right of all peoples in the region of self-determination! Acts with packet cancellations in GSPC Soviet laws and the Constitution of the Soviet Union meant a gross violation of the legal system of the USSR and the USSR territorial integrity! Moreover, infringed is international law also - Helsinki-1975 agreement on the inviolability of postwar borders in the world. March 17, 1991, by decision of the USSR Armed Forces, held a referendum on the preservation and reform of the Soviet Union. South Ossetia, legitimately participated in it and its follow-up remained in the USSR! But the fascist separatist regime Gamsakhurdia participate in the referendum illegally refused and also violated the basic principle of democracy - not allowed to express an opinion on this subject myself to the Georgian people ... 31 March of the same in 1991 fascist separatist regime GSPC has a legitimate anti-separatist referendum on \u0026quot;independence of Georgia.\u0026quot; Both South Ossetia it legitimately did not participate - as a legitimate member of the Soviet Union in a referendum held on March 17. But on the basis of its two separatist obviously shares - 17 and March 31 - the Georgian authorities have declared \u0026quot;the independence of Georgia from May 26, 1991! European Commission will easily see here a clear legal fraud - the reality is that from March to May 1991 there was a legal separation\u0026quot; Georgian territory \u0026quot;from the territory of the USSR, and then South Ossetia SIMULTANEOUSLY has been a part of two independent states - and in part independent of the USSR, and in the composition of the Independent from May 26, 1991 the newly formed Georgia ...

DECEMBER 1991 – COMPLETION OF BASIC LEGAL CONTROVERCIES BETWEEN MOSCOW, TBILISI AND TSKHINVALI

.

Thus, by sane interpretation of law, South Ossetia after the legal decisions of the USSR - and separatist decisions of Georgian Soviet Socialist Republic in March-May 1991, could not stay within the newly-May 26 separatist Georgia! At the time of the collapse of the USSR in December of 1991, formalized by Belovezhskoye agreements three Soviet Socialist republics - Russian, the Ukrainian and Belarusian, South Ossetia has not been within the separatist Georgia.
The remaining twelve of Soviet Socialist Republics in the Bielowiezhscriy act did not participate, but he was recognized as legitimate by three basic republics of the country and these twelve republics had to make choices. December 21, 1991 in Alma-Ata arrived authorized representatives of the authorities not all twelve, but only eleven republics - did not come from the already “independent separatist” Georgia. Later, these eleven republics were recognized as legitimate by the international community - but not Georgia! Its recognition was delayed until the spring of 1992, but all this time the legal process in South Ossetia was not interrupted.

Until December 21, 1991, South Ossetia will never declare independence! But the same day, when the Alma-Ata, law-abiding 11th Soviet republics have made their choice, and also held a session of the Supreme Council of South Ossetia. Before this session the status base of South Ossetia was the Declaration of Sovereignty of South Ossetia in the Soviet Union on 20.09.1990. But on Dec. 21, 1991, due to the collapse of the Soviet Union and formed a legal void - and only in one case with South Ossetia on the entire territory of the USSR, adopted a Declaration of Independence of South Ossetia. January 19, 1992 session, the decision was confirmed by referendum in South Ossetia! Thus, the entire legal way to South Ossetia to independence and the entirely lawful under the domestic law of the USSR, and international law! This means that within the “territory of Georgia” – according to every conceivable law, there was no South Ossetia!


METHOD OF PROVKING THE WAR BY LEGAL THREATS - STEPS BY MOSCOW AND TSKHINVALI TO TBILISI TO FOMENT THE WAR

Report of the European Parliament (Commission Tagliavini) bypasses key question - that of preparing the war in August 2008: the legal question! In order to consider all stages of legal provocation of war must be kept in sight of the fact that there are only two variants left: either we must admit that South Ossetia after the March-May 1991 at the same time was composed of two independent states (UN members - the USSR, and not a UN member state - Georgia) or the need to remain sane and to recognize that South Ossetia could not immediately be there and there - and not in Georgia. But the report of the European Parliament HARDLY AT departed from this obvious question - the main issue of the Ossetian-Georgian war: the legal steps the parties, the Commission ignored! Do not go into the causes of neglect - they are also known ... But the very provocative legal steps need to note - not all, but at least the principal since 2006! They get a better idea of numbering.
1. November 12, 2006 in South Ossetia was held a second for 14 years referendum on independence - the second after the January 1992 ... In 1992, we were not allowed to tell the world community legal independence of South Ossetia project, but in the main lines the draft was then prepared. However, the threats - including the killers threats, forced to resign ... Later, the project itself has been several times published in the media. Here it is important to note - in 2005, ten days Kokoity in Tskhinvali had not recieved a group to discuss about the legal project - even after the publication of this topic in the newspaper “South Ossetia” 29.09.2005. But in November 2006, the day of the second referendum, the president of South Ossetia said the media that the West will have to recognize the independence of South Ossetia and legal project will be announced after the referendum (on a human rights website “Kavkazdky uzel”; this information is still available). Hence it is clear that the President of South Ossetia did not make a decision on its own on the legal project of South Ossetia – by this Russia was settling scores with the West over Kosovo!
Both before and after the second plebiscite Russian media were highlighting this and always in connection with the process in Kosovo ... It became clear that the project after a second referendum will be announced - a project made resource of the Game against Georgia and against the illegal decision of the West on Kosovo.
2. In 2007, the Legal Project and the threat of war continued a series of publications of several authors in the only available to us the newspaper of the Social Democrat Alanya. At an international conference in Armenia (the theme of “South Caucasus and the security of Europe”), which was held by the European Parliament (headed by Teri Hakala, MP from Finland) a legal project of excluding the war was distributed to many participants.

3. February 1-4, 2008 - another international conference in Armenia ( \u0026quot;South Caucasus and the security of Europe\u0026quot;), which was held by the European Parliament (MP oversaw Teri Hakala from Finland and Germany\u0026#39;s Friedrich Ebert Foundation). And the legal draft resolution on the basis of law again referred to experts in Moscow, Georgia and the European Parliament, warning that without it - without a legal project - the war in South Ossetia is inevitable in the near future ... This project was awarded to the head of the Europe of the Georgian Ministry of Foreign Affairs K. Reading, diplomats and deputies of the Georgian Parliament and experts from civil movements. With a warning that the war is close
4. February 20, 2008, broadcast by Russia in an interview to Interfax, from an international committee of the State Duma ( Kosachev committee), the second time since the 2006 referendum, the president of South Ossetia Kokoity said that in conjunction with the State Duma the draft law will be announced by the leadership of South Ossetia in the UN . In late February, we published a newspaper warning that a catastrophe is inevitable - the game around the legal draft was already quite apparent, and pushed Georgia to make time to settle the question by force, having no chances to win by Right and Law ...
5. In June 2008, we at last managed to publish in a newspaper the Liberal Democratic Party in North Ossetia, an open letter to President Medvedev and Saakashvili - a draft law was presented and again reminded that this is the last chance to avoid the war. It is quite clear that it was prepared by Moscow and Tskhinvali, but Georgia took its lose-lose adventure decision! Special mention deserves provocative behavior, which was particularly accentuated in 2005 - this crude forgery and unlawful course lasted three years. All these years in South Ossetia is widely celebrated so-called 26;independence day on Sept. 20, arguing in all media, that South Ossetia declared independence on September 20, 1990 ... This is a forgery - September 20, 1990 was a declaration of sovereignty within the USSR - the text of the declaration is published. Strange, but Georgia has always willingly accepted this fraud as an argument of the fact of separatist South Ossetia. Judging by the reaction of Georgia, this course convinced her in the legal ignorance of Ossetia - it was effective for her: Georgia does not believe in that which is real, and believed in that they wanted to believe ... Of course, Mr. Saakashvili understood that if the draft law will be announced at the UN, then “the great restorer of the territory of Georgia: and a hero of history, he has not become ever! He realized that the time had just enough left to statements by the State Duma and South Ossetia, a legal project in the UN ... In March 2008, again was another provocative step - two of the parliament of North and South Ossetia stated that South Ossetia seceded from the Soviet Union even before the separatist Georgia - until May 1991! It was pure provocation and after March the war could be stopped only by Georgia! There is no doubt that Saakashvili perceived the provocation, but believed that with good preparation of the army he still has time before the military intervention of Russia. The decision has not wavered between two options, since both have only one outcome: either South Ossetia or Russia together declare to the UN draft, or South Ossetia itself draws a draft on the international community. And the lawyer Saakashvili understood that the first option is worse for him than the second, but closes and the second term to become the hero of Georgian history ... It was already pressed for time – either military “shock therapy” either South Ossetia is out of Georgia: himself, instead of the hero was facing the prospect to be considered as destroyer. The main question was - Russia intervenes, and if so - then when it intervenes! It is now reliably known to his entourage urged him, that Russia wouldn’t interfere or intervene too late - just in time to take Tskhinvali ... The betting was on the intervention of the West - it would have led to protracted negotiations and to strengthen Georgia’s position to a level sufficient to negotiate the project is not on the legal independence of South Ossetia, and the relationship between the Georgian and Ossetian population in the occupied and unoccupied territories! This gave us a chance to bring the theme to the entrance of the South Ossetia into Georgia on real at this point, the ratio of ethnic groups - already without legal project RSO! The temptation was great - and the choice was made ... Saakashvili has committed a war crime, choosing the South Ossetian regime willingness to substitute his people to slaughter! Russia, for its part, used the willingness of the South Ossetian regime for its own purposes. The result is known - the death of innocent! Hardened survivors, but they have been cheated again ..! Now Russia and Ossetian Ossetians convince the authors that the right and the law - it is for the West, only an empty sound, and most importantly - they have interests and hostile to the West of South Ossetia! But there is a certain stratum of the Ossetians, is not so big - this is not enough and the Caucasus, else confident that this is not so ... The allegations by U.S. officials, and Europe that they objected to a military solution, consistent with the report of the European Parliament, to apportion the responsibility for the preparation of war and to some extent even for war crimes. However, there are very obvious crimes, which has developed a complete legal framework, but they remained outside the report ...
1. The South Ossetian regime Kokoity in 2005 participated in the target moves to legally blackmailing of Saakashvili in order to provoke him to slaughter in South Ossetia. The death of innocents was part of the bargain, and billions of Russian roubles and millions of USD disappeared in South Ossetia in just one year 2007, and disappeared in the year of the budget of RSO, which is full of questions in the Russian media - all this gives an idea of the “prize fund” for the head of criminal regime and its backers in Moscow.
2. Objections to the power of choice, made by Saakashvili against those of the official of the West before the war, remain diplomatic phrases, without naming the object of the contour of his crimes. And he had the full information about the legal admissibility of power solutions from the media and diplomats of Georgia Georgian foreign ministry - and they received legal project, and wrote about it. These materials are the authors of the report could get at least since 2003!
Understatement of the report of the European Parliament on the legal section of research on the causes of war feeds the distrust of the West in the Caucasus in the part, which is developing the interests of political rivals, as the Law and the Law - these are the institutions are presented here positive difference between the West! Their absence in the report of anti-Western interests are not treated as an omission, but as a double standard policy of the West!

R.P. Magkaev
Human rights activist, Republic of North Ossetia-Alania.

A. Chochiev
Former 1st Vice-President of the Supreme Council of South Ossetia (1990-93)



======
==============

USE OF THE LEGAL POSITIONs FOR INCTIGATING THE WAR – TO THE COMMISSION OF EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT ON THE PREPARATION OF RUSSO-OSSETIAN-GEORGIAN AR IN AUGUST 2008

The report of European parliament (commission Tagliavini) on the causes of war is the assessment of certain actions by the parties from the standpoint of law. However, there are no obvious indicators of provocation undertaken by Russia and South Ossetia, Saakashvili has to impose a decision on the final crisis of war with South Ossetia. European Parliament and the political community do not have a complete picture of the reasons without the truth of the legal steps to provoke war

MARCH-MAY 1991 AND DECEMBER 1991 - THE BEGINNING OF BASIC LEGAL CONTROVERSY AMONG MOSCOW, TBILISI AND TSKHINVALI

After a period from September 1989 to June 1990, when Georgian authorities conducted a series of batch of cancellations, with the abolition of the Soviet Constitution and laws of the Soviet period the Georgian territory, the question was only - what is “Georgian territory ?»... The question of vital importance to South Ossetia, and the area of autonomy for South Ossetia, and the territory of GSPC were identified only in the Soviet times and fixed laws of the USSR!
The decision of the Georgian authorities to restore relations with Moscow to a treaty between Russia and Georgia on May 7, 1920 does not clarify the issue of ‘Georgian territory”; Since that contract was not resolved this issue - the limits were not established, while recognizing the right of all peoples in the region of self-determination! Acts with packet cancellations in GSPC Soviet laws and the Constitution of the Soviet Union meant a gross violation of the legal system of the USSR and the USSRs territorial integrity! Moreover, international right also was infringed - Helsinki-1975 agreement on the inviolability of postwar borders in the world.


March 17, 1991, by decision of the USSR Armed Forces, held a referendum on the preservation and reform of the Soviet Union. South Ossetia, legitimately participated in it and its follow-up remained in the USSR! But the fascist separatist regime Gamsakhurdia participate in the referendum illegally refused and also violated the basic principle of democracy - not allowed to express an opinion on this subject myself to the Georgian people ...
31 March of the same in 1991 fascist separatist regime GSPC has a legitimate anti-separatist referendum on \u0026quot;independence of Georgia.\u0026quot; Both South Ossetia it legitimately did not participate - as a legitimate member of the Soviet Union in a referendum held on March 17. But on the basis of its two separatist clearly shares - 17 and March 31 - the Georgian authorities have declared \u0026quot;the independence of Georgia from May 26, 1991
European Commission can easily see here a clear legal fraud - the reality is that from March to May 1991 there was a legal separation \u0026quot;of Georgian territory\u0026quot; of the USSR, and then South Ossetia SIMULTANEOUSLY has been a part of two independent states - and in part independent of the USSR, and composition of the Independent from May 26, 1991 Georgias newly formed state...

DECEMBER 1991 – COMPLETION OF BASIC LEGAL CONTROVERSIES BETWEEN MOSCOW, TBILISI AND TSKHINVALI
Thus, when sane interpretation of law, South Ossetia after the legal decisions of the USSR - and separatist solutions GSPC March-May 1991, could not stay in the newly-May 26 separatist Georgia! At the time of the collapse of the USSR in December of 1991, drawn Belovezhskoye agreements three Soviet Socialist republics - Russia, the Ukrainian and Belarus, South Ossetia has not been in the breakaway Georgian. The remaining twelve of Soviet Socialist Republics in the Bialowieza act did not participate, but he was recognized as legitimate by three basic republics of the country and these twelve republics had to make choices. December 21, 1991 in Alma-Ata arrived authorized representatives of the authorities not all twelve, but only eleven republics - did not come from the already “independent separatist”; Georgia. Later, these eleven republics were recognized as legitimate by the international community - but not Georgia! Its recognition was delayed until the spring of 1992, but all this time the legal process in South Ossetia is not interrupted.
Until December 21, 1991, South Ossetia will never declare independence! But the same day, when the Alma-Ata, law-abiding 11-Th Soviet republics have made their choice, and also held a session of the Supreme Council of South Ossetia. Before this session basis the status of South Ossetia was the Declaration of Sovereignty of South Ossetia in the Soviet Union on 20.09.1990. But on Dec. 21, 1991, due to the collapse of the Soviet Union and formed a legal \u0026quot;vacuum\u0026quot; - and only in one case with South Ossetia on the entire territory of the USSR, adopted a Declaration of Independence of South Ossetia. January 19, 1992 session, the decision was confirmed by referendum in South Ossetia! Thus, the entire legal way to South Ossetia to independence and the entirely lawful under the domestic law of the USSR, and international law! This means that within “the territory of Georgia” - on every conceivable law, there was no South Ossetia!

МЕТОД ПРОВОЦИРОВАНИЯ ВОЙНЫ ПРАВОВЫМИ УГРОЗАМИ – ШАГИ МОСКВЫ И ЦХИНВАЛА ПО ПОДТАЛКИВАНИЮ ТБИЛИСИ К ВОЙНЕ
METHOD OF PROVOKING WAR BY LEGAL THREATS – MOSOW’S AND TSKHINVALI’S UNDERTAKING TO INSTIGATE THE WAR
Report of the European Parliament (Commission Tagliavini) does bypassed chief - key - the question of preparing for war in August 2008: the legal question! In order to detect all stages of legal provocation of war must be kept in sight of the fact that there are only two varinata: either we must admit that South Ossetia after the March-May 1991 at the same time was composed of two independent states (UN members - the USSR, and not a UN member state - Georgia) or the need to remain sane and to recognize that South Ossetia could not immediately be there and there - and not in Georgia. But the report of the European Parliament HARDLY AT departed from this obvious question - the main issue of the Ossetian-Georgian war: the legal steps the parties, the Commission ignored! Do not go into the causes of neglect - they are also known ... But the very provocative legal steps need to note - not all, but at least the principal since 2006! They get a better idea of numbering.
1. November 12, 2006 in South Ossetia held a second for 14 years a referendum on independence - the second after the January 1992 ... In 1992, we were not allowed to tell the world community legal independence of South Ossetia project, but in the main sections of the draft was then prepared. However, the threats - until the killers of threats, forced to resign ... Later, the project itself has been multiply published in the media. Here it is important to note - in 2005, ten days Kokoity in Tskhinvali had not taken a group to talk about the legal project - even after the publication of this topic in the newspaper “South Ossetia”, 29.09.2005. But in November 2006, the day a second referendum, the president of South Ossetia said the media that the West will have to recognize the independence of South Ossetia and legal project will be announced after the referendum (on a human rights website “Caucasian Knot” – in original - Kavkazsky uzel); this information is still available. Hence it is clear that the President of South Ossetia is not itself to make a decision on the legal draft of South Ossetia - that Russia is settling scores with the West over Kosovo!
Both before and after the second plebiscite Russia to enhance its media and has always been discussed in connection with the process in Kosovo ... It became clear that the project and after a second referendum will be announced - a project made resource games against Georgia and against the illegal decision of the West on Kosovo.
2. In 2007, the Legal Project and the threat of war continued a series of publications by several authors in the only available to us newspaper of the Social Democrat Alanya. At an international conference in Armenia (the theme of “;South Caucasus and the security of Europe”), which was held by the European Parliament (MP curated by Teri Hakala, Finland) was submitted a legal project how to avoid the war - it was distributed to many participants.
3. February 1-4, 2008 - another international conference in Armenia (South Caucasus and the security of Europe;), which was held by the European Parliament (MP oversaw Teri Hakala from Finland and Germanys Friedrich Ebert Foundation). And the legal draft resolution on the basis of law again referred to experts in Moscow, Georgia and the European Parliament, warning that without it - without a legal project - the war in South Ossetia is inevitable in the near future ... This project was awarded to the head of the Europe of the Georgian Ministry of Foreign Affairs K. Reading, diplomats and deputies of the Georgian Parliament and experts from civil movements. With a warning that the war is getting closer!
4. February 20, 2008, broadcast by Russia in an interview to Interfax, on the grounds of an international committee of the State Duma (the committee Kosacheva), the second time since the referendum expeditiously in 2006, the president of South Ossetia Kokoity said that in conjunction with the State Duma the draft law will be declared the leadership of South Ossetia in the UN . In late February, we published a newspaper warning that a catastrophe is inevitable - the game around the legal draft was already quite apparent, and pushed Georgia to make time to solve by power a question that she has no chances win by Right and Law ...

5. In June 2008, we at last managed to publish in a newspaper the Liberal Democratic Party in North Ossetia, an open letter to President Medvedev and Saakashvili - a draft law was presented and again reminded that this is the last chance to avoid war. It is quite clear that Moscow was prepared and Tskhinvali, but Georgia is lose-lose adventure took him to develop! Special mention should be noted provocative reception, which was particularly accentuated in 2005 - this crude forgery and antipravovoy course lasted three years. All these years in South Ossetia is widely celebrated so-called “independence day” on Sept. 20, arguing in all media, that South Ossetia declared independence on September 20, 1990 ... This is a forgery - September 20, 1990 was a declaration of sovereignty within the USSR - the text of the declaration published. Strange, but Georgia has always willingly accepted this fraud as an argument “separatist South Ossetia”. Judging by the reaction of Georgia, this course convinced her in the legal ignorance Ossetia - it was effective for her: Georgia does not believe in that which is real, and then, in that they wanted to believe ... Of course, Mr. Saakashvili understood that if the draft law will be announced at the UN, ”the great restorer of the territory of Georgia” and a hero of history, he has not become ever! He realized that the time had just enough left to statements by the State Duma and South Ossetia, a legal project in the UN ... In March 2008, again was another provocative step - two of the parliament of North and South Ossetia stated that South Ossetia seceded from the Soviet Union even before the separatist Georgian - until May 1991! It was pure “legal” provocation and after March to stop the war could only Georgia! There is no doubt that Saakashvili has seen the provocation, but believed that with good preparation of the army he still has time before the military intervention of Russia. The decision has not wavered between two options, since both have only one outcome: either South Ossetia with Russia together declare to the UN draft, or South Ossetia itself draws a draft on the international community. And the lawyer Saakashvili understood that the first option is worse for him than the second, but closes and the second term to become the hero of Georgia’s history ... It was already pressed for time - or “shock therapy by manu militari or South Ossetia is outside Georgia: and himself instead of the hero - the prospect of being considered destroyer of Georgia. The main question was – would Russia intervene, and if so - then when it intervenes! It is now reliably known to his entourage urged him, that Russia would not interfere or intervene too late - just in time to take Tskhinvali ... The betting was on the intervention of the West - it would have led to protracted negotiations and to strengthen Georgia’s position to a level sufficient to negotiate the project is not on the legal independence of South Ossetia, and the relationship between the Georgian and Ossetian population in the occupied and unoccupied territories! This gave us a chance to bring the theme to the entrance of the South Ossetia into Georgia on real at this point, the ratio of ethnic groups - already without legal project RSO! The temptation was great - and the choice was made ... Saakashvili has committed a war crime, choosing the South Ossetian regime willingness to substitute his people to slaughter! Russia, for its part, used the willingness of the South Ossetian regime for their own purposes. The result is known - the death of innocent! Hardened survivors, but they cheat again ..! Now Russia and Ossetian Ossetians convince the authors that the right and the law - it is for the West, only an empty sound, and most importantly - they have interests and hostile to the West of South Ossetia! \u0026quot;But there is a certain stratum of the Ossetians, is not so big - this is not enough and the Caucasus, else confident that this is not so ... The allegations by U.S. officials, and Europe that they objected to a military solution, consistent with the report of the European Parliament, to apportion the responsibility for the preparation of war and to some extent even for war crimes. However, there are very obvious crimes, which has developed a complete legal framework, but they remained outside the report ...


!

1. The South Ossetian regime Kokoity in 2005 participated in the target moves legal blackmail Saakashvili in order to provoke him to slaughter in South Ossetia. The death of innocents was part of the bargain, and disappeared in South Ossetia Millard Russian rubles and millions of dollars in just one year 2007, and disappeared in the year of the budget RSO, which is full of questions about Russia\u0026#39;s media - all this gives an idea of the \u0026quot;prize fund\u0026quot; for the head criminal regime and its backers in Moscow. 2. Objections to the power of choice, made by Saakashvili against those of the official of the West before the war, remain diplomatic phrases, without naming the object of the contour of his crimes. And he had the full information about the legal admissibility of power solutions from the media and diplomats of Georgia Georgian foreign ministry - and they received legal project, and wrote about it. These materials are the authors of the report could get at least since 2003! Understatement of the report of the European Parliament on the legal section of research on the causes of war feeds the distrust of the West in the Caucasus in the part, which is developing the interests of political rivals, as the Law and the Law - these are the institutions are presented here positive difference between the West! Their absence in the report of anti-Western interests are not treated as an omission, but as a double standard policy of the West!

A. Chochiev
Former 1st Vice-President of the Supreme Council of South Ossetia (1990-93).







European Commission examined the preparation of war between Russia and Georgia, beginning the countdown to 1920. Unfortunately, not deeply investigated the events’ evolution in 1992. For it was in 1992, with apparently good process initiated Shevardnadze, the experts did not see a deeply flawed transition from NON-Gamsakhurdias overthrow of the legitimately elected - to the exclusion of law from the process of the Georgian-Ossetian settlement! Then Moscow and the whole world made a choice between the apparent neo-fascists Gamsakhurdia and his “democratically-anti-fascist” opponent Shevardnadze ... But we, the supporters of legal policy of South Ossetia, did not see deggerence of personalities - we are demanding strict adherence to right and the law and also by Shevardnadze! Since 1992, the pro-moscowv and pro-georgian supporters in South Ossetia pressured us with threats of physical destruction ... To deal with threats to the life of our small parliamentary faction of legal policy in the parliament of South Ossetia, I - as the leader of this trend, was forced to resign!
Since 2001, it became clear that the process goes to war precisely because the right and the law is ignored and Moscow, and Tbilisi ... Since then, we wrote to the media available to us about the inevitability of war, and in 2007 and 2008, I declared it at two international conferences in Armenia (the theme “;South Caucasus and the security of Europe”), conducted by the European Parliament (MP from Finland and Teri Hakala Friedrich Ebert Foundation of Germany). At these conferences, I handed over to experts in Moscow, Georgia and the European Parliaments draft resolution on the basis of law, warning that without a legal project - the war in South Ossetia is inevitable in the near future. After that comes a number of derivative issues of legal training of the war, without that returned Commission on the guilt of the Ossetian side is very weak or even hangs in the air ... Whereas in fact South Ossetian regime is primarily responsible for participation in the legal preparations for war! It is the Government of South Ossetia, since 1993, has withdrawn from the course of legal policy, ignored the norms and rules of international law. This is even though the only right and give the UN Law PERFECTION ARGUMENTS for exclusion from the negotiating treatment CHIEF confrontational basis - separatism. Only authorized administrative and territorial disputes in the field of law can the UN, with the involvement of the international community, to remove the threat of new exacerbations between Georgia and South Ossetia, as well - means between the West and Russia. .

_________________
My sites:
http://alania-supercomputer.narod.ru/
http://jaszix.narod.ru
http://www.ossetiny.narod.ru
http://www.biblioteki.narod.ru
http://www.skifskij.narod.ru


Вернуться к началу
 Профиль  
 
 Заголовок сообщения:
СообщениеДобавлено: 22-01, 11:49 
Не в сети
Stir Hister

Зарегистрирован: 08-06, 10:46
Сообщения: 1815
ЭТО ОБРАЩЕНИЕ ЕСТЬ

http://free-osetia.livejournal.com/

http://salkazanova.livejournal.com/3006.html

_________________
My sites:
http://alania-supercomputer.narod.ru/
http://jaszix.narod.ru
http://www.ossetiny.narod.ru
http://www.biblioteki.narod.ru
http://www.skifskij.narod.ru


Вернуться к началу
 Профиль  
 
Показать сообщения за:  Поле сортировки  
Начать новую тему Ответить на тему  [ Сообщений: 2 ] 

Часовой пояс: UTC + 3 часа


Кто сейчас на конференции

Сейчас этот форум просматривают: нет зарегистрированных пользователей и гости: 0


Вы не можете начинать темы
Вы не можете отвечать на сообщения
Вы не можете редактировать свои сообщения
Вы не можете удалять свои сообщения

Найти:
Перейти:  

cron
Powered by Forumenko © 2006–2014
Русская поддержка phpBB







А что касается вопроса «Кто мы?»... У меня есть возможность общаться практически со всеми зарубежными и российскими алановедами, учеными-историками и археологами, и никто не отрицает тот факт, что осетины являются аланами (никакими не потомками), единственными наследниками огромного скифо-сармато-аланского мира, сохранившими язык, эпос, традиции, культуру, государственность, в том числе - флаг, геральдику.
ТЕМИНА ТУАЕВА ВСЕМИРНО ПРИЗНАННЫЙ ИСТОРИК.


ДОКАЗАТЕЛЬСТВА, ЧТО ОСЕТИНЫ ЭТО АЛАНЫ :




1. Особенности зубной системы ранних кочевников Горного Алтая. стр. 157: "... редкий (в мире) фен 3YM2 информативен при анализе европеоидных популяций [Зубов, Халдеева, 1993]. Максимум значения его частоты встречаемости (при мировом размахе 0 — 10 приходится на группы, относящиеся к ......... европеоидной расы (Северная Индия, таджики Памира — см.: [Зубов, Халдеева, 1993]). С высокой частотой (13%) признак проявляется у осетин [Зубов, 1973]. При этом, ......... по данным представленной А. А. Зубовым таблицы мирового распределения, он практически не обнаруживается в других древних и современных группах населения мира [Зубов, 1973]. " Стр. 158: "Особый интерес представляет обнаруженная в пазырыкской одонтологической серии высокая частота проявления относительно редкого (в мире) фена 3YM2, сопоставимая со значениями показателя у осетин . В этой связи хотелось бы отметить замечание А.А.Зубова и Н. И.Халдеевой о наличии оснований для связи процессов распространения этого фена с миграциями арийских полемён [Зубов, Халдеева, 1993, с. 83]". Таким образом, академические исследования палеоантропологии саков, скифов и других иранских и североиндийских народов доказали, что расовые особенности являются лакмусовой бумажкой определения арийской принадлежности саков, скифов, сарматов, аланов, северных индийцев и осетин. У саков и скифов зафиксировали тот же расовый антропологический признак 3YM2 , что и у восточноиранских народов и индоиранцев, а у других народов этого признака нет . Следовательно, саки и скифы Центральной Азии и западнее являются индоиранскими народами, конкретно восточноиранскими.




2. Rosser нашол у осетинов 43% R1b Современная концентрация R1b максимальна на территориях, связанных с кельтами: в южной Англии около 70 %, в северной и западной Англии, Испании, Франции, Уэльсе, Шотландии, Ирландии — до 90 % и более. А так же, например, у басков — 88,1 %, испанцев — 70 %, бельгийцев — 63 %, итальянцев — 40 %, немцев — 39 %, норвежцев — 25,9 % и других. У народов Восточной Европы встречается значительно реже. У осетинов - 43 %,



3. Кроме этих соматических у Ненцев Удмуртов и Осетин высокий процент U5a mtdna который считается Арийским и Найден генетико-археологами у "Арийцев" Алтая, и у Белых проникших в Китай.



4. "with respect to mtDNA, Ossetians are significantly more similar to Iranian groups than to Caucasian groups. "
- Genetic Evidence Concerning the Origins of South and North Ossetians









5. Осетины родствены Европейцам по линиям: E1b1b1a2 V13+ и R1b1b2a - L23



Фамилии Аллен-Аллан-Алан, ФитзАлан(Стюарты), Осборн-Озмент, Росс-Руш, Ирвин, Нарди, Алдэр-Элдэр и фамилии Allen, Stewart, Lombardi, Szentes, Elder(Алдары) и интересные окончании на "Тон"(Дон?) и "он".
Это базовый гаплотип субклада L23 , который получен в результате выделения из числа имеющихся маркеров, наиболее часто встречающихся-мод. Т.е. усредненный гаплотип, который предположительно был у родоначальника субклада и от которого считают вновь появившиеся мутации маркеров в виде цифровых значений. В данном случае у Кубатиева всего 12 мутаций от модального гаплотипа на 67 маркеров.
Наличие довольно близких генетически по Y-DNA, представителей субклада L23 ( менее 20 мутаций на 67 маркеров) на Кавказе и в Европе, позволяет предполагать , что носители данного субклада мигрировали в Европу совсем недавно, приблизительно 2 000 лет назад. Они связаны с миграцией в Европу, неких легионеров, которые служили в римской армии.

Ossetians are related to Europeans on lines: E1b1b1a2 V13 + and R1b1b2a - L23 Surnames: Allen-Allan-Alan, Fitzalan (Stuwart, Stuart), Osborn-Ozment, Ross-Rush, Earvin, Nardie, Alder-Elder and surnames of Lombardi, Szentes and surnames which terminated on "Tone" (Don )
research: R1b1b2a - L23EE Modal + Kubatiev + Abdullayev + kuduhov+ Luguev+ Allen +Allan +FitzAlan(Stewart) +Nardi
Existence is enough relatives genetically on Y-DNA, representatives of a subtreasure of L23 (less than 20 mutations on 67 markers) in the Caucasus and in Europe, allow to assume that carriers of this subtreasure migrated to Europe quite recently, about 2 000 years ago. Their migration to Europe is connected with certain legionaries who served in the Roman army. It is basic gaplogroup a subtreasure of L23 which is received as a result of allocation from among available markers, most often meeting - fashions. I.e. average gaplogroup which allegedly the ancestor of a subtreasure had and from which consider again appeared mutations of markers in the form of digital values. In this case Kubatiyev has only 12 mutations from modal gaplogroup on 67 markers.

User ID Last Name Origin Haplogroup Tested With Markers Compared Genetic Distance


JNN7F E1b1b1a2 V13+ modal Unknown E1b1b1a* Other - V13+ haplotype modal - - Z3XSV Tavitov Tauitti, North Ossetia - Alania, Russia Unknown Family Tree DNA 67 16
TCX79 Allen Virginia, USA Unknown Family Tree DNA 67 13
CX94E R1b1b2a - L23EE Modal Unknown R1b1b2a* Family Tree DNA - -
5Y5EA Kubatiev Makhchesk, Ossetia, Russia R1b1b2a* Family Tree DNA 67 12
MX42V kuduhov Vladikavkaz, Russia R1b1* Genographic Project 18 5
PWN78 Romitti Suzzara, Lombardy, Italy R1b1b2a (tested) Family Tree DNA 67 8
8U3YQ Earhart Staudernheim, Rheinland-Plalz, Germany R1b1b2a (tested) Family Tree DNA 67 12
NZVS5 Ross Dornoch, Scotland R1b1b2a1b5 (tested) Family Tree DNA 67 15
V4RUP Ross Sutherland, Scotland R1b1b2* Family Tree DNA 67 13
SSKBK Stewart Unknown Unknown Family Tree DNA 67 16
ZZGVV Ross Unknown R1b1b2 (tested) Family Tree DNA 67 14
UVB8X Ross Scotland R1b1b2* Family Tree DNA 67 13
E6Q75 Templeton Iredell Co, NC, Scotland R1b1b2a1b5 (tested) Family Tree DNA 67 16
GNACX Rose Quebec, Quebec, Canada Unknown Family Tree DNA 67 14
5QJD8 Irving Kirklinton, Cumbria, England Unknown Family Tree DNA 67 16
M4DMC Blair Scotland Unknown Family Tree DNA 67 14
2MZGD Stewart Scotland Unknown Family Tree DNA 67 16
7HBA7 MacDonald Lewiston, Urquhart & Glenmoriston, Scotland R1b1b2 (tested) Family Tree DNA 67 15
YEXGA Allen Unknown R1b1b2 (tested) Family Tree DNA 67 16
YQHKF Rose West Virginia, USA R1b1b2a1b5 (tested) Family Tree DNA 67 15
7TVE9 Nixon Missouri, USA Unknown Family Tree DNA 67 14
E2AEU Allen North Carolina, USA R1b1b2* Family Tree DNA 67 16
FDZF4 Allen Virginia, USA R1b1 (tested) Family Tree DNA 67 16
E7P6N Allen Mitchell County, GA, USA, Georgia, USA R1b1b2 (tested) Family Tree DNA 67 15
Q3KV8 Stewart North Carolina, USA R1b1b2a1b (tested) Family Tree DNA 67 17
Z5PSZ Blair North Carolina, USA R1b1b2 (tested) Family Tree DNA 67 16
Z33VT Irwin Adams County, Pennsylvania, USA R1b1b2a1b5 (tested) Family Tree DNA 67 18
2Z6WU Allen Unknown R1b1b2a1b (tested) Family Tree DNA 67 14
5724Y Stewart Scotland R1b1b2 (tested) Family Tree DNA 67 18
XS5DS Elder Pittenweem, Fife, Scotland R1b1b2 (tested) Family Tree DNA 67 17
KEWST Allen England R1b1b2a1a (tested) Family Tree DNA 67 17
YPXDZ Roush Germany R1b1b2a1b3 (tested) Family Tree DNA 67 16
NJ65W Stewart England R1b1b2a1b (tested) Family Tree DNA 67 17
RYU3K Roche Wexford, Ireland R1b1b2a1a* Family Tree DNA 67 17
H7JJM Irvine Aberdeenshire / Kincardineshire, Scotland R1b1b2* Family Tree DNA 67 17
J3Q6T Stewart Unknown R1b1b2a1b4c (tested) Family Tree DNA 67 17
2B7UR Landon Stokes County, North Carolina, USA R1b1b2a1b (tested) Family Tree DNA 67 17
mabkf Tagert Stewart county, Tennessee, USA R1b1b2a1b5 (tested) Other -
Family Tree DNA, Trace Genetics, Relative Genetics, Ethnoancestry, DNA-Fingerprint, SMGF 67 18
PMVA8 Irvin Virginia, USA Unknown Family Tree DNA 67 18
S22HC Stewart Virginia, USA Unknown Family Tree DNA 67 16
A5TVE Stewart Georgia, USA Unknown Family Tree DNA 67 17
4GCN5 Stewart Appin, Argyllshire, Scotland R1b1 (tested) Family Tree DNA 67 17
NSZYS Stewart Whalsay, Shetland Isles, Scotland R1b1b2* Family Tree DNA 67 18
DZ2UC Stuart United Kingdom R1b1b2a1b5* Family Tree DNA 67 17
T3Q27 Allen Connecticut, USA R1b1b2 (tested) Family Tree DNA 67 19
BFKN8 Alder Maryland, USA R1b1b2* Family Tree DNA 67 19
YQCC9 Allen Unknown R1b1b2 (tested) Family Tree DNA 67 19
JXHHK Ross Unknown R1b1b2a1b (tested) Family Tree DNA 67 19
AHEPZ FitzAlan Unknown R1b* Family Tree DNA 67 17
HFRHJ Irwin Unknown Unknown Family Tree DNA 67 19
4TVGX Osborne Unknown Unknown Family Tree DNA 67 19
694VT Irwin Scotland Unknown Family Tree DNA 67 19
8NC3G Elder Alexander Co NC, Iredell Co NC, Scotland R1b1b2 (tested) Family Tree DNA 67 18
D3MSG Irving Dumfries, Scotland Unknown Family Tree DNA 67 19
UFTZP Armstrong Crosscavanagh, Pomeroy Parish (Donaghmore), Northern
Ireland Unknown Family Tree DNA 67 19
MYBA2 Irwin Ireland R1b1 (tested) Family Tree DNA 67 19
Q2S2M Stewart Ireland Unknown Family Tree DNA 67 18
KZJ2U Allen England R1b1b2 (tested) Family Tree DNA 67 19
4H9SS Stewart Alford, England R1b1b2a1b* Family Tree DNA 67 19
55D4U Ozment England Unknown Family Tree DNA 67 19
35UQ4 Ozment London, England R1b1b2a1a (tested) Family Tree DNA 67 19
4AKDG Irvine Gleno, Antrim Co., Ireland Unknown Family Tree DNA 67 20
5F58T Stewart kircubbin, Northern Ireland R1b1b2 (tested) Family Tree DNA 67 20
8HEUY Stewart Scotland Unknown Family Tree DNA 67 19
6695Q Stewart Scotland R1b1b2a1b5 (tested) Family Tree DNA 67 19
5BY5F Irwin Unknown Unknown Family Tree DNA 67 20
qqawe Di Nardi Salerno, Italy R1b1b2* Family Tree DNA 67 20
MJG35 Stuart Londonderry, Scotland Unknown Family Tree DNA 67 20
JZKH9 Stewart Dergalt near Strabane, Ulster, Ireland R1b1b2 (tested) Family Tree DNA 67 21
KYYK6 Holland Unknown Unknown Family Tree DNA 67 20
Y7QYG Werner Unknown R1b1b2a1b5 (tested) Family Tree DNA 67 21
K8QH7 Allen Unknown R1b1b2a1a4 (tested) Family Tree DNA 67 21
AEGC9 Stewart Virginia, USA R1b1b2* Family Tree DNA 67 21
EBPZM Stewart Virginia, USA R1b1b2 (tested) Family Tree DNA 67 20
SV9JY Allen Canada R1b1b2a1b5 (tested) Family Tree DNA 67 22
B7XDY Allen Antrim, Northern Ireland Unknown Family Tree DNA 67 22
KQQDM Stewart Broughshane, Antrim, Northern Ireland R1b1b2a1b5 (tested)
Family Tree DNA 67 21
XGWCV Stewart Down, Northern Ireland Unknown Family Tree DNA 67 21
9WDE6 Stewart Foss, Perthshire, Scotland R1b1b2 (tested) Family Tree DNA 67 21
E7RU2 Stewart Elizabethtown KY, Kentucky, USA R1b1 (tested) Family Tree DNA 67 20
CKQFK Stuart Glenolden, Pennsylvania, USA R1b1b2a1b5 (tested) Family Tree DNA 67 21
R5RFW Stewart Pennsylvania, USA R1b1b2a1b5 (tested) Family Tree DNA 67 21
388CJ Stewart Perthshire, Scotland R1b1b2a1b (tested) Family Tree DNA 67 22
66PEA Stewart Kirkcowan, Scotland R1b1b2a1b (tested) Family Tree DNA 67 22
FNDTG Allan Yetholm, Scotland Unknown Family Tree DNA 67 22
9GBB3 Allen Belfast, Ulster, Ireland R1b1b2 (tested) Family Tree DNA 67 22
ATVCM STEWART Ireland K (tested) Family Tree DNA 67 22
6EDUD Allen Unknown Unknown Family Tree DNA 67 22
7v64p Allen North Carolina, USA R1b1b2a1b (tested) Family Tree DNA 67 23
M9843 Stewart Virginia, USA R1b1b2a1b4 (tested) Family Tree DNA 67 23
3SB5Y Allen Unknown Unknown Family Tree DNA 67 24
KWJJ3 Allen Belfast, Ireland Unknown Family Tree DNA 67 23
N9S2Z Allen Erie, England R1b1b2 (tested) Family Tree DNA 67 23
X23B2 Allen South Carolina, USA B2 (tested) Family Tree DNA 67 24
U7EME Stewart Perthshire, Scotland Unknown Family Tree DNA 67 24
4FUQP Stewart Lane Side, Colvend, Kirkcudbrightshire, Scotland E1b1b1a2 (tested) Family Tree DNA 67 11
8P2QR Lombardi Italy Unknown Family Tree DNA 66 14
A84EV Szentes Bukovina, Transylvania, Hungary Unknown Family Tree DNA 37 5
34H2M Elder North Carolina, USA E1b1b1* Family Tree DNA 37 6
CV2W4 ELDER Unknown E1b1b1a (tested) Family Tree DNA 37 6
F97V5 Dutton England E1b1b1* Family Tree DNA 67 10
92HMY Whittington Georgia, USA Unknown Family Tree DNA 67 9
FJ9GE Smith Grafton, New York, USA E1b1b1a2 (tested) Family Tree DNA 67 9
4AK2U Smith Unknown E1b1b1a2 (tested) Family Tree DNA 67 10
GQD24 Dupont Three Rivers, Quebec, Canada E1b1b1a2 (tested) Family Tree DNA 67 11
EGV8G Lancaster Colne, Lancashire, England E1b1b1a2 (tested) Family Tree DNA 67 11
YYMK7 McKnight Unknown E1b1b1 (tested) Family Tree DNA 67 14
327HE Lancaster Barton, England Unknown Family Tree DNA 67 12
E5KCM Smith Arkansas, Texas, USA Unknown Family Tree DNA 67 11
QYBCJ McMahon Ireland Unknown Family Tree DNA 66 16
CVYBX Phillips England E1b1b1* Family Tree DNA 66 15
YR9MJ Gordon Slonim, Belarus E1b1b* Family Tree DNA 66 15
9F6RX Addington hodgdon me., USA E1b1b1 (tested) Family Tree DNA 66 14
4vb7e SCHUETZ Oszeninken/Osseningken bei Skaisgirren, Kr. Ragnit, East Prussia/Ostpreu?en, Germany E1b1b1a2 (tested) Other - Multiple 67 19
C8USB Ossetian_Modal_G2a1a Ossetia, Russia G2a1a Family Tree DNA 67 0
ENKNN Aboity Zaramag, Ossetia, Russia Unknown Family Tree DNA 67 3
6PS3J Dzhugaev Ossetia G2a (tested) Family Tree DNA 67 4
PHD23 Totrov Ossetia, Russia G2a1a
Family Tree DNA 67 5
QE9HC Ozel Unknown G2a (tested) Family Tree DNA 67 6
MZJUF Ramonov Russia G2a1a (tested) Family Tree DNA 67 6
GJ229 Berezov Ossetia, Russia G2a1
Family Tree DNA 67 7
6R6HV Ramonov Ossetia, Russia G2a1a
Family Tree DNA 67 6
YYV5A Berezov Unknown G2a1 (tested) Family Tree DNA 67 7
X74WN Parker Gloucestershire, England G (tested) Family Tree DNA 67 13
84N8Q Show Benedict Tasborough, now Tasburgh, Norfolk, England G2a1a (tested) Family Tree DNA 67 16
N4UYA Benedict Tasborough, now Tasburgh, Norfolk, England G2a1a (tested) Family Tree DNA 67 17
E7N9B Benedict East Anglia, England G2a1a (tested) Family Tree DNA 67 18
VVHWJ Show Sloan Niemirow, Poland G2a1 (tested) Family Tree DNA 67 19
ZDVM9 Szentes Transylvania, Hungary Unknown Family Tree DNA 67 18
ZNAFX Chabiev Koban, Ossetia, Russia G2a1a Family Tree DNA 67 19
D2KDR lyamov Mustafino, Ossetia, Russia G2a1a Family Tree DNA 67 26
CSJK6 Show Moody Moulton, England G2a1a (tested) Family Tree DNA 67 24
XQHGA Price Unknown G2a (tested) Family Tree DNA 67 26
TYB8D Gursel Bulgaria G2a1 (tested) Family Tree DNA 67 27
VYH96 Lermi Unknown G (tested) Family Tree DNA 67 27
WUEXC Wright Unknown G2a1a (tested) Family Tree DNA 67 28











В галерею заходит мужчина около 70 лет, с газетой в руке. Мне супруга говорит сразу, что он похож на осетина. Мужчина подходит к нам, представляется Гиемом Жонлу и говорит, что он по происхождению алан. Я был, честно говоря, немножко ошарашен. Он рассказал мне, что он потомок алан. Родился в Бретании. В городе, где он родился, есть замок «Шато Алон», и там каждый второй – алан. Из поколения в поколение предки передавали, что они не британцы и не французы, а именно аланы. Так вот в его роду, утверждал Гием Жонлу, все были потомственные военные, хотя он сам врач и уже давно на пенсии, но осанка у него действительно военная. Его сыновей зовут Артур и Алан. Мы с ним долго общались, он очень много знал про алан, расспрашивал о России, об Осетии. Я ему подарил кое-какие сувениры, теперь он себя называет не аланом, а осетином.









MODERN ALANIA (Les Sables-d’Olonne ) POPULATION 300 000 PEOPLE- IN FRANCE - Ле-Сабль-д’Олон - аланские пески